Weaveand
Member
I think the proven science if the fact that a raised CDT level is indicative to increased alcohol consumption. There's a very close relationship between the CDT level and a number of alcohol units consumed. There have been many trials, using people of different sexes, ages and weights. The results were conclusive, raised alcohol = raised CDT.I’m just wondering because as I said I’m not a doctor or a scientist.
It just seems odd to call it an exact science, to say that people have different ‘background CDT levels’ and then not be able to account for those levels in comparison to the total level to establish a real reading?
I do not know, but I would imagine we all have a start position of CDT from 0.0-0.3
So, it would be hard to explain a score of 4.0 and claim abstinence.