You have given your opinion, I have given mine. I believe at present, Parliament agree's with me. There is an appeals procedure open to the defendant and the cps which it also appears you do not agree with.
I have no problem with the current drink drive laws. I am NOT Pro drink driving and nor am I pro drug driving.
Your opinion is fine but you go way off subject and introduce irrelevant extremes that have nothing to do with the discussion such as, hanging, hands being cut off, drink drivers being sentenced to life in prison (which nobody suggested in the first place).....seriously if you stuck to the point without the drivel you would make more sense.
Where do I state that I do not agree with the appeals procedure? Are you reading the correct post? I fully agree that anyone who has been convicted of any crime has the right to appeal.
I too have no problem with the current drink driving laws but I would like to see that they are increased in severity from a 2nd offence.
For someone who claims not to be pro drink driving, all your posts suggest the drink driver when caught is the victim.
What exactly did you say in your post that Parliment agrees with?
I dont mean any offence by this but do you post whilst drinking? It really is difficult to make much sense out of what you say and see what point you are trying to make. These weird posts always seem to be made in the late evening